In Situ Hybridization Method And Buffer

ABSTRACT

An improved method of in situ hybridization which relies on an improved formulation of the in situ hybridization buffer is described. In at least some formulations the buffer are non-toxic. The combination of Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) comprising ISH probes and the improved ISH buffer are useful for detection of small non-coding RNA as well as in the manufacturing of ISH kits directed to the detection of such small non-coding RNA. Further disclosed is a method of semi-quantitative ISH and demonstration of the semi-quantitative ISHs diagnostic potential.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of in situ hybridization(ISH) on tissue sections. In particular the invention relates to animproved method of in situ hybridization which relies on an improvedformulation of the in situ hybridization buffer, at least some of whichformulations are non-toxic. Together with Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA)comprising ISH probes the improved ISH buffer are useful for detectionof specific nucleic acid molecules such as mRNA, rRNA and inparticularly small non-coding RNA as well as in the manufacturing of ISHkits directed to the detection of such small non-coding RNA. Furtherdisclosed is a method of semi-quantitative ISH and demonstration of thesemi-quantitative ISHs diagnostic potential.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In situ hybridization (ISH) of tissue samples is a nucleic acidhybridization technique used to investigate and localize target nucleicacids in morphologically preserved structures, e.g. within a cell, atissue, a nucleus or a chromosome.

Today most pathological samples are routinely fixed andparaffin-embedded to allow for histological analysis and for archivalstorage. Formalin fixation and paraffin embedding are estimated to beused in over 90% of specimens prepared by clinical labs in preparationof specimens for histological diagnosis. Archives of well-annotatedformalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens are invaluableresources for retrospective studies of human diseases, however the FFPEprocedure as well as the storage of the samples is known to introduceadverse effects on the RNA quality (Ahlfen et al. (2007) PLoS ONE 2(12):e1261). Formalin fixation proceeds relatively slowly, a fixation-time of16-24 h is conventional, and results in a relatively slow quenching ofthe endogenous RNases which invariably cause some RNA degradation.However, numerous studies have shown the formalin fixation as well asother aldehyde-based fixations such as paraformaldehyde- andglutaraldehyde-fixed specimens can be used for in situ hybridization ofRNA.

Several methods for ISH on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue havebeen described; interestingly all protocols are comprised with ahybridization step in a formamide comprising hybridization buffer.Formamide is also mentioned as the component in the hybridization mix inEP 440.749 B1, EP 432.221 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,521,061 and U.S. Pat. No.5,750,340 as well as in the papers on ISH prepared on archival FFPEspecimens known to the inventor. However importantly, formamide ischaracterized as a teratogenic substance that should be avoided.

Recently, a large number of small non-coding RNA genes have beenidentified and designated as microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) (for review, seeKe et al. 2003, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7:516-523). They are typically17-24 nucleotides (nt) long RNAs that are processed from longerendogenous hairpin transcripts. To date more than 6000 miRs have beenidentified in humans, worms, fruit flies and plants according to the miRregistry database release 11.0 in April 2008, hosted by SangerInstitute, UK.

The importance of microRNAs in cancer is highlighted in a recent article(Barbarotto et al 2008 Int. J. Cancer. 122:969-977), which summarizesthe main paradigms for the miRNA involvement in human cancers: Thus,“(i) miRNAs are altered in every type of analyzed human cancer; (ii)miRNAs act as oncogenes and tumor suppressors; (iii) miRNAs alterationsmay cause cancer predisposition; (iv) miRNAs profiling is a newdiagnostic tool for cancer patients and (v) miRNA profiling representsprognostic tools for cancer patients.”. Accordingly, methods inparticularly ISH methods that can be used for localization of expressionand quantification of microRNAs in specific cells and tissues fromcancer patients are needed.

Some further of the recent attention paid to small RNAs in the sizerange of 17 to 25 nt is due to the phenomenon RNA interference (RNAi).RNAi is the mechanism in which double-stranded RNA leads to thedegradation of any RNA that is homologous RNAi relies on a complex andancient cellular mechanism that has probably evolved for protectionagainst viral attack and mobile genetic elements. A crucial step in theRNAi mechanism is the generation of short interfering RNAs (siRNAs)which are double-stranded RNAs that are about 22 nt long each.

Quantification of microRNAs and siRNAs by ISH procedures is verychallenging due to the small size of the RNAs. Furthermore a highspecificity is required since different small RNAs may only differ withrespect to a single nucleotide, but present day ISH-protocols for FFPEsamples often suffer by lack of sensitivity or high background levels.

Thus an improved method of detecting small non-coding RNAs by ISH inarchival paraffin embedded specimens is highly needed.

The present invention provides an improved, robust and fast ISH methodfor detection of non-coding RNAs in FFPE-samples. The method avoid useof the teratogenic formamide while providing even better ISH-resultsthan obtained with standard formamide comprising hybridization buffers.Furthermore the method has the advantage that it can be used forquantification of small non-coding RNAs by ISH in archival FFPE-samples.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Prior to the present invention, the present inventors believed thatforamide was an indispensable component of a successful ISHhybridization mix.

However, the present inventors, surprisingly, observed that formamidemay be substituted by certain chaotropic substances such as, forexample, urea and guanidine hydrochloride to obtain even betterISH-results than obtained with standard formamide comprisinghybridization buffers.

Thus, in a first aspect, the invention pertains to a method fordetection of nucleic acid molecules comprising a contiguous a nucleotidesequence such as mRNA by in situ hybridisation in fixed cellularspecimens comprising of a hybridization step which is performed in aformamide-free, hybridization buffer that comprises a chaotropiccomponent selected from the group of urea, salts of guanidinium orguanidine and a mixture of two or more members of the group.

In one preferred embodiment, the invention pertains to a method fordetection of small, non-coding RNAs by in situ hybridisation in fixedcellular specimens comprising of a hybridization step which is performedin a formamide-free, hybridization buffer that comprises a chaotropiccomponent selected from the group of urea, salts of guanidinium orguanidine and a mixture of two or more members of the group.

In a further preferred embodiment, the improved, formamide-free,hybridization buffer is used of detecting nucleic acid molecules instandard formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections orin frozen (cryostat) tissue sections.

In a second aspect the invention provide an improved, formamide-free,hybridization buffer for the use of detecting nucleic acid moleculescomprising a contiguous a nucleotide sequence such as mRNA, rRNA orsmall non-coding RNAs in tissue sections with probes, in particularlyLNA-probes, by in situ hybridization, the buffer comprise 0.5 to 5 M ofa chaotropic component selected from the group comprised of urea andsalts of guanidinium (or guanidine) or a mixture of two or more membersof the group.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention an improved, formamide-free,hybridization buffer for detecting nucleic acid molecules in standardformalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections is provided.

According to the present invention, there is also provided a kit fordetection of at least one small non-coding RNAs in standardformalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue by in situhybridization, said kit comprise the improved, formamide-free,hybridization buffer and least one LNA-probe optimized for the specificdetection of said one small non-coding RNA.

A further advantage of the herein disclosed method is its robustness andlow variance allowing it to be used for semi-quantitative in situhybridization allowing for miRNA-associated diagnostics such as for amethod of estimating/evaluating disease-free survival in stage II coloncancer comprising:

-   -   a) determining the relative level of miR-21 in at least one        representative tissue section from a stage II colon cancer of        said patient determined by the method of claim 7,    -   b) comparing the level of miR-21 in the patient to a set of        relative levels of miR-21 obtained by the method of claim 7 from        a reference panel of stage II colon cancer samples obtained from        a reference panel of patients with known disease history,    -   c) grouping the reference panel in tertiles according to the        relative level of miR-21 determined by the method of claim 7;        and    -   d) taking the miR-21 level of said at least one representative        tissue section from a stage II colon tumor from said patient        that falls within the miR-21 level of the upper (high        expressing) tertile as indicative of an increased likelihood of        short disease-free survival, and taking a miR-21 level of said        at least one representative tissue section from a stage II colon        tumor from said patient that falls within the miR-21 level of        the lower (low expressing) tertile as indicative of an increased        likelihood of long disease-free survival.

DEFINITIONS

Prior to a discussion of the detailed embodiments of the invention isprovided a definition of specific terms related to the main aspects ofthe invention.

Small, Non-Coding RNAs

The terms “miRNA” and “microRNA” refer to 17-25 nt non-coding RNAs. Theyare processed from longer (ca 75 nt) hairpin-like precursors termedpre-miRNAs. MicroRNAs assemble in complexes termed miRNPs and recognizetheir targets by antisense complementarity. If the microRNAs match 100%to their target, i.e. the complementarity is complete, the target mRNAis most probably cleaved, and the miRNA acts like a siRNA. If the matchis incomplete, i.e. the complementarity is partial, then the translationof the target mRNA is most probably blocked.

The terms “Small interfering RNAs” or “siRNAs” refer to 21-25 nt RNAsderived from processing of linear double-stranded RNA. siRNAs assemblein complexes termed RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) and targethomologous complementary RNA sequences for endonucleolytic cleavage.Synthetic siRNAs also recruit RISCs and are capable of cleavinghomologous complementary RNA sequences.

The term “RNA interference” (RNAi) refers to a phenomenon wheredouble-stranded RNA homologous to a target mRNA leads to degradation ofthe targeted mRNA. More broadly defined as degradation of target mRNAsby fully or partly complementary siRNAs. MicroRNAs (miRNA or miR) are anabundant class of short endogenous RNAs that act as posttranscriptionalregulators of gene expression by base-pairing with their target mRNAs.

The term “messenger RNA” or mRNA is used as in the art to describe theRNA-type that is transcribed from a DNA template, and which carries thecoding information to the sites of protein synthesis, the ribosomes.

The term “ribosomal RNA” (rRNA) refers to the RNA component of theribosome.

In Situ Hybridization

“In situ hybridization” is a technique providing the specific detectionof nucleic acids molecules within individual cells, tissue sections oreven whole mounts (i.e. whole organisms, embryons, organs etc.)typically deposited on a solid support, in floating sections orimmersed.

Cellular Specimen

The term “cellular specimen” denotes a sample of cells. It include, butare not limited to, a tissue section, specific types of cell isolatedfrom tissue sections (e.g. by laser capture microdissection), acytospin, a cell smear, a sample of cells obtained from a cell growthmedium or a mixture thereof. The terms encompass samples regardless oftheir physical condition; stated differently, the terms do not excludematerial by virtue of the physical state (such as, but not limited to,being frozen or stained or otherwise treated).

Fixed Cellular Specimen.

By the terms “fixed” or “fixed cellular specimen” is referred to theprocess wherein cellular specimens are preserved while maintaining thehistological structure of the specimen. Fixation of cellular specimenscan be accomplished by various cross-linking fixatives to formcross-links in tissue, by alcohol and acetone to coagulate and dehydratethe specimen, or by cryopreservation. Cross-linking fixatives includeformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, paraformaldehyde,ethyldimethyl-aminopropyl-carbodiimide, and dimethylsilserimidate.

By the terms “aldehyde-fixed” and “aldehyde-fixed cellular specimen” isreferred to the process wherein cellular specimens are fixed by aldehydefixatives such as formalin (formaldehyde), glutaraldehyde orparaformaldehyde.

FFPE Specimen

shall mean formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen. FFPE specimen(often referred to as archival FFPE specimen, routinely-fixed specimen,FFPEs or FFPE-blocks) is routinely processed at the hospitals.

Routinely-Fixed

shall mean fixation according to standards at pathology departmentstypically using 1-3 days fixation of clinical tissue specimens in 10%neutral-buffered formalin (i.e. 4% (0.32 M) formaldehyde inphosphate-buffered saline, pH around 7) at room temperature. New andfast fixation methods, e.g. involving micro-wave-based fixation, isbecoming routine and thus comprised by third definition.

Routinely-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Specimen

shall mean any piece of tissue of eukaryotic origin, taken bydissection, biopsy, blood sample, etc., which is first spatiallyimmobilized by cross-linking its macromolecules in a locked positionsand then embedded in paraffin to prevent degeneration. Such fixed,paraffin-embedded specimen can be stored at room temperature for yearsand sections from them can be made with a thickness typically in therange of 3-6 μm can be cut and transferred to solid support fordown-stream molecular, histological, pathological and cytologicalevaluation. For the avoidance of doubt tissue comprised by thisdefinition includes FFPE specimens.

Chaotropic Component

In the present context the term “chaotropic component” refers to a“chaotropic agent”, also known as a “chaotropic reagent” or a“chaotrope”, which is any any chemical substance which disturbs theordered structure of liquid water. A chaotropic agent also disrupts thethree dimensional structure in macromolecules including but not limitedto proteins, DNA, or RNA. Preferred chaotropic salts are, guanidiniumthiocyanate, guanidinium isothiocyanate or guanidinium hydrochloride.Another preferred chaotropic agent is urea.

Salts of Guanidinium or Guanidine

includes but are is not limited to guanidinium thiocyanate, guanidiniumisothiocyanate or guanidinium hydrochloride.

Nucleic Acids Molecules

In the present context “nucleic acids molecules” refer to nucleic acidpolymers. such as RNA, DNA or polymers comprising or consisting ofnucleotide analogues (such as LNA oligonucleotides).

Hybridization

“Hybridization” refers to the bonding of two complementary singlestranded nucleic acid polymers, the (such as oligonucleotides), such asRNA, DNA or polymers comprising or consisting of nucleotide analogues(such as LNA oligonucleotides). Hybridisation is highly specific, andmay be controlled by regulation of the concentration of salts andtemperature. Hybridisation occurs between complementary sequences, butmay also occur between sequences which comprise some mismatches. Theoligonucleotides used in the methods of the present invention may,therefore be 100% complementary to the target molecule. Alternatively,in the oligonucleotides may comprise mismatches.

Tm

The term “Tm” or “melting temperature” of an oligonucleotide measuresthe stability of a DNA duplex formed between the oligonucleotide and itsperfect complement DNA strand. Tm is defined as the temperature at which50% of the DNA duplexes formed between the oligonucleotide and itsperfect complement DNA strand are dissociated into single strands. Thelength and nucleotide composition, such as the sequence of nucleotidesand content of G and C nucleotides, of the oligonucleotide are importantfactors affecting Tm.

Substitution of the normal A, G, C and T nucleotides with thecorresponding LNA molecules in an oligonucleotide increases Tm.Similarly, hybridisation conditions defined by salt concentration,oligonucleotide concentration, and the presence of denaturants (such asformamide or DMSO) affects Tm. Those skilled in the art of molecularbiology know that several useful formulas for calculation of theoreticalTm's have been developed to evaluate the Tm of an oligonucleotide forPCR, Southern and Northern blots, and in situ hybridization. Examples ofTm calculators are OligoCalc (W. A. Kibbe (2007) Nucleic Acids ResVolume 35, Web Server issue W43-W46) and LNA Probe Tm Predictor athttp://www.exiqon.com.

Probe

In typical embodiments herein, a “probe” is a capture agent that isdirected to a polynucleotide e.g. an microRNA. Typically the probe is apolynucleotide itself. The polynucleotide that a probe is directed to isreferenced herein as “target”. If a polynucleotide, e.g. a probe, is“directed to” or “specific for” a target, the polynucleotide has asequence that is complementary to a sequence in that target and willspecifically bind (i.e. hybridize) to that target under hybridizationconditions. The hybridization conditions typically are selected toproduce binding pairs of nucleic acids, e.g., probes and targets, ofsufficient complementarity to provide for the desired level ofspecificity in the assay while being incompatible to the formation ofbinding pairs between binding members of insufficient complementarity toprovide for the desired specificity. Such hybridization conditions aretypically known in the art. Examples of such appropriate hybridizationconditions are also disclosed herein for hybridization of a probe to ato a target nucleic acid within individual cells or tissue sectionsdeposited on a solid support. The target will typically be a miRNA forembodiments discussed herein.

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA)

By “locked nucleic acid”, “LNA” is meant a nucleoside or nucleotideanalogue that includes at least one LNA monomer. By “LNA monomer” or“LNA nucleoside” or “LNA nucleotide” is referred to a nucleoside ornucleotide analogue wherein the ribose part is modified to form abicyclic structure as disclosed in PCT Publication WO 99/14226.

LNA monomers as disclosed in PCT Publication WO 99/14226 are in generalparticularly desirable modified nucleic acids for incorporation into anoligonucleotide to improve its functionality as a probe. Additionally,the nucleic acids may be modified at either the 3′ and/or 5′ end by anytype of modification known in the art. For example, either or both endsmay be labeled with a Digoxigenin moiety. Desirable LNA monomers, LNAnucleosides and LNA nucleotides and their method of synthesis also aredisclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,060, U.S. Pat. No. 6,268,490, PCTPublications WO 01/07455, WO 01/00641, WO 98/39352, WO 00/56746, WO00/56748, WO 00/66604 and WO 03/020739 and elsewhere. Preferred LNAmonomers, also referred to as “oxy-LNA”, are LNAs wherein the bridgebetween R4* and R2* as shown in formula (I) of WO 99/14226 and alsoshown below, together designate —CH2-O— or —CH2-CH2-O—.

Oligo

By “oligonucleotide,” “oligomer,” or “oligo” is meant a successive chainof monomers (e.g., glycosides of heterocyclic bases) connected viainternucleoside linkages. An oligo that includes at least one LNAmonomer may be referred to as “LNA”.

In the present context, the terms “nucleobase” covers naturallyoccurring nucleobases as well as non-naturally occurring nucleobases.Thus, “nucleobase” includes not only the known purine and pyrimidineheterocycles, but also heterocyclic analogues and tautomers thereof.Illustrative examples of nucleobases are adenine, guanine, thymine,cytosine, uracil, purine, xanthine, diaminopurine, and 5-methylcytosine.

In the nucleic acid sequences described herein LNA monomers are depictedin capitals (T, A, G) and DNA monomers in lower case (t, a, c, g).Modified LNA monomers include 5′ methyl cytosine shown as capital C.

Embodiments of the present invention is described below, by way ofexamples only.

DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method for the detection of nucleicacids within individual cells or tissue sections deposited on a solidsupport.

As discussed previously, the present inventors initially consideredformamide to be an indispensable component of a successful ISHhybridization mix. However confronted with the generally acceptedgenotoxic effects of formamide (EU Dangerous Substances Directive(67/548/EEC)) they searched for alternatives.

Much to their surprise they found that substituting formamide with achaotropic component selected from the group of urea, salts ofguanidinium or guanidine in the ISH hybridization mix paved the way toan improved method for detection of small, non-coding RNAs by in situhybridisation of fixed cellular specimens. One particularly preferredtype of small, non-coding RNAs are miRNA. As illustrated in the examplesthe method provide specific in situ detection by non-radioactive labeledLNA probes for miRNA even in standard formalin-fixed andparaffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections and in particular Example 5show that the present method yield results that are superior to thoseobtained with an ISH hybridization mix that comprise formamide.

Although an irritant, guanidinium is not mentioned in the EU DangerousSubstances Directive (67/548/EEC) and guanidine hydrochloride is used inthe treatment of the neuromuscular condition called Lambert-Eatonmyasthenic syndrome at dosages up to 40 mg/kg/day (U.S. Pat. No.7,521,479) indicating that guanidinium is relatively non-toxic tohumans. However, whereas example 6 show that salts of guanidinium orguanidine may substitute formamide in the method, the preferredembodiment of the method is one wherein the chaotropic component in theISH hybridization mix is urea.

Urea is in general considered non-toxic. Urea is widely used as anactive component in various skin-treatment products, and when used as adiuretic it may be given in dosages of about 1 to 2 g/kg/day, even wheninjected or infused (U.S. Pat. No. 7,521,479).

Furthermore the examples illustrate a method wherein the chaotropiccomponent in the ISH hybridization mix is urea appears superior to onewherein the chaotropic componenet is guanidine hydrochloride (Example6).

The small size (approx 22 nts) and often low level of expression ofdifferent miRNAs require use of sensitive probes for their detection byISH. As described in WO 06/069584 LNA probes are particularly suitableto serve for this purpose as the use of LNA results in probes withimproved sensitivity and high sequence specificity especially for smallRNA target sequences. Accordingly in a preferred embodiment the situhybridization probe contains one or more LNA monomers. LNA comprising insitu hybridization probes wherein the hybridization probe is labeled inboth 3′ and 5′end with digoxigenin (DIG) are particularly preferred. Asshown in the examples excellent results were obtained with relativelyshort LNA-probes, comprising approximately 30% LNA monomers.

In general the method is not depending on the labeling of thehybridization probe, The probe may as well be labeled with streptavidin,biotin or a compound for which specific antibodies are available whichinclude: fluorescein; dinitrophenol; amphetamine; barbiturate;acetaminophen; acetohexamide; desipramine; lidocaine; chloroquinine;quinine; ritalin; phenobarbital; phenytoin; fentanyl; phencyclidine;methamphetamine; metaniphrine; digoxin; penicillin;tetrahydrocannibinol; tobramycin; nitrazepam; morphine; Texas Red;TRITC; primaquine; progesterone; bendazac; carbamazepine; estradiol;theophylline; methadone; methotrexate; aldosterone; norethisterone;salicylate; warfarin; cortisol; testosterone; nortrptyline; propanolol,estrone; androstenedione, biotin, thyroxine, and triiodothyronine,biotin or digoxigenin. Also radioactive labeled, or metal-(gold-labelled) probes are contemplated.

In one particularly preferred embodiment the method comprise a step ofhybridization wherein the cellular specimen is contacted with ahybridization-solution comprising:

-   -   at least one non-radioactive labelled probe comprising 7-22        nucleotides which are capable of hybridizing to a specific RNA        sequence.    -   a hybrid stabilizing agent selected form the group of salts of        mono- and di-valent cations. Preferred salts are sodium citrate        or sodium chloride optionally further buffered e.g. with        phosphate. In a preferred embodiment the hybrid stabilizing and        buffering agent is SSC (SSC, 1×=0.15M sodium chloride and 0.015M        sodium citrate). SSC is preferably used at a concentration of 1        to 8×, such as between 1.5 and 5×, 2 and 4× or 2 and 3×. 2.5×SSC        is preferred for in situ hybridization to miRNA targets when        using the LNA-probes disclosed herein.    -   urea in a concentration between 0.5 and 5 M; as illustrated in        example 3 we obtained excellent results over the whole range        between 0.5 and 4 M such as between 1 and 3 M. The best        signal-to-noise ratio was obtained with 2M urea. Importantly        example 3 show that the chaotropic component is indispensable,        no specific signal was obtained in the absence of urea.

Optionally the hybridization-solution in addition comprise:

-   -   Denhardt's Solution at a concentration between 0-2× (preferably        1×); and    -   from 0-0.5 mg/ml of a carrier RNA. The preferred carrier RNA is        yeast t-RNA at a final concentration of approximately 0.25 mg/m        L.

Depending on the particular target/probe combination, the concentrationof hybrid stabilizing and buffering agent and the type and concentrationof chaotropic agent the optimal hybridization temperature varyconsiderable. In general the hybridization temperature is between 35° C.and 65° C. and the samples hybridize for 5 min to over night, such asfor 5 to 240 min, 30 to 120 min or 5 to 60 min even 30 to 60 min. Anumber of formulas are available for arriving at an approximatehybridization temperature. The nearest-neighbor model, (SantaLucia, J,Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95: 1460-5) is a preferred model.It should be noted that LNA-enhanced oligonucleotides have differentmelting properties from DNA oligonucleotides. It is advisable to use theoligo Tm predicting tool athttp://www.exiqon.com/ls/homeofIna/Oliqo-tools/tm-prediction-tool.htm.This tool is based on a modified nearest-neighbor thermodynamical modeland on over 10,000 LNA oligonucleotide measurements, and providereliable estimates. However as illustrated in example 4 even smalldifferences in the hybridization temperature produce significantdifferences. Consequently the present method imply an experiment toestablish the optimal hybridization temperature for a specificcombination of specimen, probe and target.

A detailed description of the method is disclosed in example 1.

Whereas the method is developed for FFPE it is construed that any typeof cellular specimens that are fixed by use of cross-linking fixativescan be used with the method. thought freeze sections. Due to itsremarkable robustness we believe the method only require smalladjustments to perform well on specimens fixed using denaturatingfixatives such as alcohol and/or acetone, or even by cryopreservation.

As illustrated in Example 2 the method enables specific analysis ofindividual pre-miRNA and mature miRNA. The specific detection of thedouble stranded pre-miRNA show that the method can be used to detect awide range of small RNAs including small double-stranded RNAs such assiRNAs which are double-stranded RNAs wherein the complementary strandsare about 22 nt long each. We envision that the method even isapplicable for detection of mRNA.

As illustrated in the examples the method is particularly robust andreliable. Such a robust and reliable method is a prerequisite formeaningful quantification. As illustrated in example 7, 8 and 9. Themethod can be used to obtain semi-quantitative expression data.

Accordingly, in a further embodiment the method comprise a step whereinthe hybridization signal is visualized by formation of the dark-blueNBT-formazan precipitate, and further comprise a quantization comprisingthe steps of:

-   -   taking a number, such as 8-17, random images from within the        tumor area,    -   checking that said random images contain evident cancer cells,        excluding those images which do not, also excluding images with        tissue and staining artifacts,    -   employing a supervised segmentation based on Bayesian        classification trained to recognize blue pixels (i.e.        NBT-formazan precipitate),    -   quantify the relative miR-21 level by estimating either the        total blue area (TB=B+P) and use TB as a measurement of the        specific RNA level in the sample.

In general it is advantageous to counterstained specimens with varyhistochemical stains to improve the contrast and facilitate therecognition of cellular components. Hematoxylin is a frequently usedbasic dye that stains nuclei blue due to an affinity to nucleic acids inthe cell nucleolus. More histochemical stains may be combined to evenfurther improve the analysis of the specimen. Hematoxilin is forinstance often combined with eosin, an acidic dye that stains thecytoplasm pink.

Most of the specimens in the example was stained with nuclear fast redwhich stain cell nuclei bright red.

Specimens are counterstained with nuclear fast red (see example 7, 8 and9) are very suitable for the semi-quantitative analysis and allow thecalculation of another estimator to supplement the total blue arearelative to nuclear red stained area (TBR) estimator. The steps toarrive at this estimator is based on specimens wherein the hybridizationsignal is visualized by formation of the dark-blue NBT-formazanprecipitate and the specimens also are counterstained with nuclear fastred, and further comprise a quantization comprising the steps of:

-   -   taking a number, between 8-17, random images from within the        tumor area,    -   checking that said random images contain evident cancer cells,        excluding those images which do not, also excluding images with        tissue and staining artifacts,    -   employing a supervised segmentation based on Bayesian        classification trained to recognize blue pixels (i.e.        NBT-formazan precipitate), red pixels (i.e. nuclear fast red)        and purple pixels (i.e. pixels colored with both NBT-formazan        and nuclear fast red) to estimate the blue areas (B) and the red        areas (R) and the purple areas (P)    -   quantify the relative level of the RNA by estimating either the        total blue area (TB=B+P) and/or the relative total blue area        (TBR=TB/TR, wherein total red area TR=R+P) and use TB and/or TBR        as a measurement of the specific RNA level in the sample.

The method is preferably used to quantify the level of small, non-codingRNA, in particular miRNAs.

The crucial component of the present invention is the improved,formamide-free, hybridization buffer that is especially suitable fordetecting of small non-coding RNAs in standard formalin-fixed andparaffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections with LNA-probes by in situhybridization, the buffer comprise 0.5 to 5 M of a chaotropic componentselected from the group comprised of urea and salts of guanidinium (orguanidine) or a mixture of two or more members of the group.

In one embodiment the hybridization buffer comprise a chaotropiccomponent or the mixture of chaotropic components that are selected fromthe group of urea and guanidine hydrochloride. However, urea is thepreferred chaotropic component as it is considered non-toxic in theamounts it is being used in the present context. Example 5 show thatthis buffer results that are superior to those obtained with an ISHhybridization mix that comprise formamide, furthermore the urea-basedbuffer is stable for at least 13 months at 4° C. This is in starkcontrast to ISH-buffers based on formamide, which we have observed havea short shelf-life at 4° C.

The hybridization buffer of the invention typically further comprise:

-   -   a hybrid stabilizing agent selected form the group of salts of        mono- and di-valent cations. The hybrid stabilizing agent may be        a buffer in itself, or it may be further buffered e.g. with        phosphate buffer,    -   urea in a concentration between 0.5 and 5 M;    -   Denhardt's Solution in an amount of 0-2×; and    -   a carrier RNA, such as yeast t-RNA, in an amount of 0-0.5 mg/ml.

Numerous publications indicate that LNA-probes are especially wellsuited for the ISH of miRNA, see e.g. Wienholds et al. (2005) Science309, 310-311. Accordingly one aspect of the invention is a kit fordetection of at least one small non-coding RNAs in standardformalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue by in situhybridization, said kit comprise the improved, formamide-free,hybridization buffer of any claims 10 to 13 and least one LNA-probeoptimized for the specific detection of said one small non-coding RNA.Preferably the kit is directed to the detection of a microRNA, and theat least one enclosed LNA-probe is preferably labeled both in its 3′ and5′-end with digoxigenin.

miRs represent robust and stable biomarkers in formalin fixed paraffinembedded FFPE material. There are several publications demonstratingthat miRs are stable and regulated in cancer. A recent paper by Schetteret al (JAMA, 2008) describes the use of miR as prognostic biomarkers incolon cancer. Of particular interest is that the authors were able toseparate non-cancerous specimens from cancerous specimens by the use ofone miR (miR-21). This separation was supported by multivariateanalyses, showing that miR-21 expression was independent of diseasestage. It is evident from literature as well as from example 1, 2, 5, 7,8 and 9 that in general the miR-21 predominantly is expressed infibroblast-like cells located in the stromal compartment of the tumorswhereas the cancer cell compartment generally expresses very low levelsof miR-21. However, recently we (Nielsen et al. (2011) Clin ExpMetastasis 28: 27-38) have shown that in certain tumors there areclusters of cancer cells that express high levels of miR-21. Suchsignificant spatial distribution immediately signified to the inventorsthat data obtained from a semi-quantitative miR-21 ISH, such as the onedescribed herein, would be especially useful as a diagnostic tool. Theuse of the semi-quantitative miR-21 ISH as a diagnostic tool isillustrated in example 9. In brief the method of example 9 is a methodof predicting the disease-free survival of a stage II colon cancerpatient comprising:

-   -   a) determining the relative level of miR-21 in at least one        representative tissue section from a stage II colon cancer of        said patient determined by the method of claim 7 and,    -   b) comparing the level of miR-21 in the patient to a set of        relative levels of miR-21 obtained by the method of claim 7 from        a reference panel of stage II colon cancer samples obtained from        a reference panel of patients with known disease history,    -   c) grouping the reference panel in tertiles according to the        relative level of miR-21 determined by the method of claim 7;        and    -   d) taking a miR-21 level of said at least one representative        tissue section from a stage II colon tumor from said patient        that falls within the miR-21 level of the upper (high        expressing) tertile as indicative of an increased likelihood of        short disease-free survival, and taking a miR-21 level of said        at least one representative tissue section from a stage II colon        tumor from said patient that falls within the miR-21 level of        the lower (low expressing) tertile as indicative of an increased        likelihood of long disease-free survival.

According to literature (e.g. Bartels (2009) Clin Chem 55, 623-631), awide range of miRs can be used as prognostic and diagnostic markers ofvarious types of cancer. The inventors stipulate that in those instanceswhere the miRs express a significant spatial distribution thesemi-quantitative ISH of the present invention will prove to be avaluable addendum to the diagnostic tool box.

The invention is further illustrated in the following non-limitingexamples and the figures wherein

FIG. 1. Shows the result of miRNA in situ hybridization using thenon-toxic, chaotropic compound urea in the prehybridization andhybridization buffers. On the figure are eight panels: a-d in color anda′-d′ in b/w, showing miR-21, scrambled, miR-21+ unlabeled and U6 snRNA.Black arrow points at examples of specific signals.

FIG. 2. Shows the specificity of the method. Four variants of miRNA-21probes was analysed by in situ hybridization using 2 M urea in thehybridization buffer. Ten panels: a-e in color and a′-e′ in b/w, showingthe ISH using the miR-21, the miR-21_3, the miR-21_5, the miR-21_pre andthe miR-210. Black arrow points at specific signals, white arrow atcarbon deposits.

FIG. 3. Shows results of miRNA-126 ISH detection in response to zero and2 M of urea in the pre-hybridization and hybridization buffers. Shown inthe figure are Four panels: two in color, two in b/w, showing miR-126detection in the presence/absence of urea. Arrow points at specificsignals, star at unspecific signals.

FIG. 4. Shows miRNA-21 (Panels c-d) and miRNA-126 (Panels a-b) in situhybridization at 48° C. and 55° C. in the presence of 2 M urea in thehybridization buffer. Panels: a-d are in color and a′-d′ in b/w.Temperature of hybridization is abbreviated Thyb. Arrow points atspecific signals, star at unspecific signals.

FIG. 5 Shows miRNA-21 (Panels b,d,f) and miRNA-126 (Panels a,c,e) insitu hybridization at 55° C. in the presence of either 2 M urea, 3 Mformamide or 6 M formamide in the prehybridization and hybridizationbuffers. Panels: a-f are in color whereas a′-f′ are in b/w. The arrowpoints at examples of specific signal.

FIG. 6 shows the results of miRNA-126 detection in colon tissue by insitu hybridization at 55° C. in the presence of 2 M urea (Panel a) andvarious concentrations of guanidine in the pre-hybridization andhybridization buffers (Panels c-f). Panel a-f in color and a′-f′ in b/w.Arrows point at vessels, star indicate epithelium.

FIG. 7. Illustrate the semi-quantitative ISH exemplified by the imagesampling and image analysis of a miR-21 in situ hybridization signal incolon cancer. Panel (a) present a typical example of a whole tissuesection (panel a) with normal mucosa, tumor area and submucosa after insitu hybridization for miR-21 and counterstaining with nuclear red. Thetumor area is encircled and random systematically placed image positionsare indicated by squared frames. Sample images are captured with a 20×objective at the systematically placed image positions. Panel (b) showone such sample image. The sample images are subsequently processed witha supervised pixel classifier which have been trained to separate theblue in situ hybridization signal from the red counter stain and thepurple in situ hybridization signal overlaying the nuclear red, panel(c). Note false color red correlate to nuclear fast red in panel (b)whereas the blue ISH signal in panel (b) is shown as a green false colorin panel (c). The area within the frames indicated in the lower leftcorner of panel (b) and (c) are in enlarged and shown in panel (d) andpanel (e). Note the blue in situ hybridization signal of panel (d)appear as bright green, the purple signal of panel (d) is as yellow andthe red signal of panel (d) appar as bright red in the classified image,panel (e). Bars in panel (a): 250 μm, in panel (b) and (c): 40 μm, andin panel (d) and (e): 4 μm.

FIG. 8A. Illustrate the stability of the hybridization buffer by anmiRNA-21 in situ hybridization on colon cancer tissue hybridized with anurea-containing hybridization buffer prepared according to the dateindicated in figure. Panel (a)-(h) are color, (a′)-(h′) are b/w.

FIG. 8B. Is a presentation of the semi-quantitative data obtained by anumber of miRNA-21 in situ hybridization on colon cancer tissuehybridized with an urea-containing hybridization buffer preparedaccording to the date indicated in figure. Boxes indicate thedistribution of expression values from the 25^(th) to the 50^(th)percentile. The dots indicate observations outside the 25^(th) to the50^(th) percentile. The horizontal line in the box is the median.

FIG. 9 shows a tertile plot of Kaplan-Meier estimates of miRNA-21 insitu hybridization signal. Cox regression analyses were performed tocompare the statistical power of the observed miRNA-21 expressionlevels, measured as TBR values in 130 colon cancer patients (panel A)and TB values in the same 130 colon cancer patients (panel B).

[A] indicate the lower tertile (the 33.3% of patients with the lowestmiR-21 level as estimated with the method of the invention).[B] the intermediate tertile.[C] indicate the highest tertile (the 33.3% of patients with the highestmiR-21 level as estimated with the method of the invention).

Indicated are the number of events=deaths in the three tertiles duringthe 72 months of observation and the number of patients in each group at0, 24 and 48 months

FIG. 10 shows the results of in situ hybridization of four miRNA speciesin different types of human tissue using 2 M urea in the hybridizationbuffer. The four probes targeting miRNA-124 in brain (upper panel),miRNA-126 in kidney, miRNA-145 in the bowel wall (Panel c) and miRNA-205in cervix (lower panel). The 4 panels to the left (a-d) are color, the 4panels to the right (a′-d′) are b/w.

FIG. 11 shows the results of in situ hybridization of human β-actin mRNAin a human esophagus cancer using an LNA probe. The FFPE sample werepurchased from Proteogenex (Culver City, Calif.). Bar 40 μm.

EXAMPLES General Methods

Tissue Sources.

Table 1 identifies the providers of the routinely-fixed,paraffin-embedded specimens used in Examples 1-10 for miRNA in situhybridization analyses.

TABLE 1 Providers of the FFPE specimens used in Examples 1-10. Ranx05 isa reference to the Danish RanX05 Colorectal Cancer Study. Some resultsfrom studies of this patient-cohort has been published in Scand. J.Gastroenterol., February 2000; 35(2): 212-7. Example and panel Tissuetype Tissue providers 1a-d Colon cancer Hvidovre Hospital, Ranx05 2a-eLung cancer Proteogenex 3a-b Colon cancer Proteogenex 4a-d Colon cancerProteogenex 5a-f Colon cancer Proteogenex 6a-f Normal colon Proteogenex7a Colon cancer Hvidovre Hospital, Ranx05 7b Colon cancer HvidovreHospital, Ranx05 7c Colon cancer Hvidovre Hospital, Ranx05 7d Coloncancer Hvidovre Hospital, Ranx05 7e Colon cancer Hvidovre Hospital,Ranx05 8A(a-h) Colon cancer Proteogenex 8B Colon cancer Proteogenex 9Colon cancer Hvidovre Hospital, Ranx05 10a Normal brain OdenseUniversity Hospital (BW Christensen) 10b Kidney cancer Proteogenex 10cNormal colon Proteogenex 10d Normal Proteogenex cervix/cancer

Nucleotide Sequences.

Table 2 provides an overview of the miRNA species discussed in Examples1-10 and the sequences of the corresponding, LNA-enhancedoligonucleotides used as probes. Information on LNA content andpredicted melting temperatures (Tm) against a complementary RNA sequencein a medium salt buffer (10 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 mMEDTA, pH 7.0) is also offered. All probes were designed by Exiqon,Denmark.

TABLE 2 Overview of the miRNA species and probes(Exiqon, Denmark) used in Examples 1-10. LNA Seq miRNA content PredictedID NO species Probe Sequence (%) T_(m)  1 hsa-miR-21 miR21tcaacatcagtctgataagcta 32 82.7  2 hsa-miR-21 miR21_3 tcaacatcagtctga 4080.6  3 hsa-miR-21 miR21_5 acatcagtctgataagc 41 81.7  4 hsa-miR-21miR2l_loop catgagatttcaacagtca 42 82.4  5 hsa-miR-124 miR124ggcattcaccgcgtgcctta 25 89.8  6 hsa-miR-126 miR126 gcattattactcacggtacga33 84.5  7 hsa-miR-145 miR145 agggattcctgggaaaactggac 30 84.3  8hsa-miR-205 miR205 agactccggtggaatgaagga 29 87.3  9 hsa-miR-210 miR210gctgtcacacgcaca 27 79.7 10 hsa-miR-424 miR424 ttcaaaacatgaattgctgctg 4183.3 11 no miRNA Scrambled gtgtaacacgtctatacgccca 32 87.3 12 no miRNAU6 snRNA cacgaatttgcgtgtcatcctt 27 —

Detection Systems and Image Analysis.

Visiopharm's integrated microscope and software module (Visiopharm,Hoershoelm, Denmark), comprising a Leica DM 6000B microscope (Leica,Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with an automated stage and slide loader(Ludl, Hawtorne, USA) and a DP72 CCD camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), wasused for image analysis. Exposure of sample images was kept at 6.993milli-seconds with red-green-blue (RGB) values at 170-180 in blankareas. Supervised segmentation based on Bayesian classification, whereeach pixel is classified according to its chromatic properties, was doneusing the Visiomorph (Visiopharm, Hoershoelm, Denmark) software tool.The following colors were identified for supervised classification:Blue=in situ hybridization signal. Purple=in situ hybridization signaloverlaying nuclear red. Red=nuclear red stain separated from unstainedbackground.

Presentation of Data.

The figures in the Results Sections of Examples 1-10 consist of a numberof color images (primary data) and corresponding gray-scale images. Thegray-scale images is a representation of the primary color images andsupposed to visualize the in situ hybridization signal in a form thatreproduce well during the printing process typically used for patentdocuments. Most grayscale images are recognized by letters followed byan apostrophe. These grayscale images were obtained using a trainedpixel classifier where the color images are translated into black andwhite images. This way, blue and purple hybridization signals weretranslated into black, whereas red and background signals weretranslated into light gray or white colors. References in the ResultsSections of Examples 1-10 are to the colored images only. Table 3provides an overview of the magnifications and type of images used, aswell as the size (in μm) of the tissues depicted by the figures in theResults Sections of Examples 1-10.

TABLE 3 Information on the images in the Results Sections of Examples1-10. Example Lens Image X, μm Y, μm 1a-d x20 Standard 620 460 2a-e x40Standard 230 310 3a-b x20 Stitched 1070 480 4a-d x20 Standard 620 4605a-f x20 Standard 620 460 6a-f x20 Stitched 1200 500 7a x1.25 Stitched24000 13000 7b x20 Cropped 620 400 7c x20 Cropped 620 400 7d x20 Zoom 7526 7e x20 Zoom 75 26 8A(a-h) x20 Standard 620 460 8B NA NA NA NA 9 NA NANA NA 10a x40 Standard 310 230 10b x20 Standard 620 460 10c x20 Stitched1470 1100 10d x20 Stitched 970 540

Example 1

Non-toxic in situ hybridization of miRNA in routinely-fixed,paraffin-embedded specimen using DIG-labeled LNA probes is enabled bythe chaotropic compound urea.

Introduction

Illustrated by miRNA-21 expression in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embeddedspecimen by in situ hybridization analysis, Example 1 shows that urea inthe hybridization buffer facilitates a non-toxic hybridization of miRNAspecies.

Methods

An in situ hybridization protocol is described for the detection ofmiRNA-21 in routinely formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) humancolon cancer tissue specimens containing both normal mucosa and tumortissue, were used (Table 1).

Probes.

LNA-containing oligonucleotides were designed by Exiqon, Denmark. FormiRNA-21 detection, the LNA-enhanced sequence tcaacatcagtctgataagcta(estimated T_(m)=83° C.), digoxigenin-labeled at the 5′- and 3′-ends,was used at a concentration of 40 nM (Seq-ID No 1 in Table 2). Anun-labeled version of the miR-21 probe with an identical LNA pattern wasincluded in competition experiments. As positive control a 5′digoxigenin-labeled probe at 0.1 nM with the sequence:cacgaatttgcgtgtcatcctt and an estimated T_(m) of 84° C., specific for U6snRNA (Seq-ID No 12 in Table 2), was used. A 5′- and3′-digoxigenin-labeled oligonucleotide with the scrambled sequence:gtgtaacacgtctatacgccca and an estimated T_(m) of 87° C. (Seq-ID No 11 inTable 2) was included as negative control at 40 nM.

Water.

To prepare stock solutions, for dilutions and for washes, Milli-Q-grade,RNase depleted water was used.

Mounting Tissue Sections on Solid Support.

After trimming of the block, 6 μm thick sections of the FFPE specimenswere cut and moved to a dry-sterilized Ziehl-Nielsen jar with 25° C.RNase-free water. The tissue sections were transferred to a water bathheated to 40-50° C., where they were stretched to avoid tissue folds,and then immediately mounted on SuperFrost®Plus slides (MicromInternational, Walldorf, Germany). The slides were air-dried 1-2 hoursat 25° C. and stored at 4° C.

Deparaffination.

The paraffin sections on the SuperFrost®Plus slides were deparaffinizedthrough 10 immersion baths containing xylene (baths 1-3), 99.9% ethanol(baths 4-6), 96% ethanol (baths 7-8) and 70% ethanol (baths 9-10). Baths1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 10 were 5-minute immersions, whereas baths 4, 5, 7,and 9 were 10-consecutive in-and-out immersions. The SuperFrost slideswith the tissue sections were then placed in phosphate buffered saline(PBS) containing 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na₂HPO₄ and 2 mM KH₂PO₄(Cat. No. 70013-073, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA).

In Situ Hybridization Procedure with Non-Radioactive ChromogenicDetection.

The SuperFrost slides with the tissue sections were mounted in Tecanslide-covers and locked into Tecan flow-through cassettes, which wereplaced in a Tecan Freedom Evo automated hybridization instrument (Tecan,Männedorf, Switzerland) and exposed to a continuous flow of thefollowing buffers, enzymes, oligonucleotides and other components at thetemperatures and for the time lengths indicated:

1) Wash: PBS at 25° C. for 6 min.

2) Wash: Protein Kinase K Reaction Buffer containing 5 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mMEDTA and 1 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, at 37° C. for 6 min.3) Protein Kinase K treatment: Protein Kinase K Reaction Buffercontaining 15 μg/ml Protein Kinase K (Cat. No. 03-115-887-001, Roche,Basel, Switzerland) at 37° C. for 8 min.

4) Wash: PBS at 25° C. for 6 min.

5) Prehybridization: Non-toxic, nuclease-free buffer containing 2.5×SSC(Cat. No. AM9765, Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, USA); 2M urea;1×Denhardt's Solution (Cat. No. 30915, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA);and yeast t-RNA (Cat. No. 83853, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) at afinal concentration of 0.25 mg/mL at 62° C. for 15 min.6) Hybridization: same buffer as in Step 5), but also containing 40 nMmiRNA-21 probe at 57° C. for 60 min.7) wash: 5×SSC at 62° C. for 5 min.8) wash: 1×SSC at 62° C. for 7 min.9) wash: 0.2×SSC at 62° C. for 14 min.10) wash: 0.2×SSC at 30° C. for 7 min.

11) Wash: PBS at 30° C. for 6 min.

12) Blocking of unspecific antibody binding: the DIG wash and BlockBuffer Set (11-585-762-001, Roche, Switzerland) was used. The tissuesections were incubated in freshly prepared Blocking Solution (1:10 inmaleic acid buffer: 0.1 M maleic acid, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.5) for 15 minat 30° C.13) Detection of digoxigenin-labeled probes: alkalinephosphatase-conjugated sheep anti-digoxigenin (11-093-274-910, Roche,Switzerland) diluted 1:500 in Blocking Solution containing 0.1×PBS and0.1% Tween-20.

14) Wash: PBS at 30° C. for 4 min.

15) Enzymatic development: nitra-blue tetrazolium (NBT/BCIP)ready-to-use tablets (Cat. No. 11-697-471-001, Roche, Switzerland)following the manufacturer's instructions, at 30° C. for 60 min.16) Wash: KTBT buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 10 mMKCl at 30° C. for 10 min.17) Wash: water at 25° C. for 2 min.18) Counterstain: Nuclear Fast Red (Cat. No. H-3403, VectorLaboratories, Burlingame, USA) diluted 1:2 with water at 25° C. for 1min.19) Wash: water at 25° C. for 6 min.

Dehydration.

The SuperFrost slides with the tissue sections were dismantled from theTecan chambers and flow-through cassettes and placed in tap-water. Theslides were dehydrated through 6 ethanol baths: 70% ethanol (baths 1-2),96% ethanol (baths 3-4), and 99.9% ethanol (baths 5-6). Baths 1, 3, and5 were 10-consecutive in-and-out immersions, whereas baths 2, 4, and 6were 5-minute immersions. Immediately following dehydration, theSuperFrost slides were then mounted with Eukitt medium (Cat. No.361894-G, VWR, Herlev, Denmark).

Detection, Image Analysis and Presentation of Data.

Detection; image analysis and data presentation were done as describedin the General Methods Section.

Results

FIG. 1 shows the results of miRNA in situ hybridization using thenon-toxic, chaotropic compound urea in the prehybridization andhybridization buffers. A strong signal was obtained with thedouble-DIG-labeled miRNA-21 probe in parallel with little or no diffusebackground stain (Panel a). The miRNA-21 signal is detected in thestromal compartment. No signal was observed with the double DIG-labeledscrambled probe (Panel b). Hybridization with a mixture of the miRNA-21probe and unlabeled probe resulted in a strongly reduced ISH signal(Panel c). An ISH signal for snRNA U6 was observed in the nuclei of allcell types (Panel d). Data on magnification, tissue size and otherinformation of relevance to the images, are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

Based on the result obtained in Example 1, we conclude that in situdetection by DIG-labeled LNA probes for miRNA in FFPE is possible usingthe non-toxic, chaotropic compound urea in the hybridization buffer. Andaccordingly that the teratogenic formamide, which for decades was thechaotrope of choice in hybridization buffers for in situ hybridization,can be substituted by the non-toxic urea.

Example 2

Specific in situ hybridization of miRNA-21 by variants of miRNA-21probes in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen by DIG-labeled LNAin urea-based ISH buffer.

Introduction

Illustrated by in situ hybridization of variants of miRNA-21 probesincluding one covering the loop region of miRNA-21, Example 2 shows thatISH with the urea-comprising hybridization provide sufficientspecificity to discriminate between individual pre-miRNA and maturemiRNA species in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1.Detection; image analysis; and data presentation were done as describedin the General Methods Section.

Specimens.

Five serial tissue sections of human lung cancer tissue from aroutinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen identified in Table 1 wereprepared as described in Example 1

Probes.

Five double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced oligonucleotides weredesigned by Exiqon, Denmark. Three probes including a full-length 22-mer(Seq-ID No 1 in Table 2), a 15-mer (Seq-ID No 2 in Table 2) and a 17-mer(Seq-ID No 3 in Table 2) all targeted to the stem-region of thepre-miRNA-21. A 19-mer (Seq-ID No 4 in Table 2) targeted the miRNA-21loop region. The fifth probe, which targeted miRNA-210 (Seq-ID No 9 inTable 2), was used as negative control. All probes were tested at afinal concentration of 40 nM.

Results

FIG. 2 shows the results of a specificity analysis of four variants ofmiRNA-21 probes by in situ hybridization using 2 M urea in thehybridization buffer. Analysis was done on serial tissue sections cutfrom the same FFPE specimen. The four probes targeting miRNA-21 alldemonstrated an intense signal in the stromal fibroblast-like cells. Forcomparison, no in situ hybridization signal was obtained with the probetargeting miRNA-210. In addition to the miRNA-21 probe variantsidentified in the Methods Section of this Example, we also tested afull-length miRNA-21 probe directed towards the mature miRNA-21. Thisprobe had an in situ hybridization pattern identical to the fourmiRNA-21 probe variants (data not shown). Data on magnification, tissuesize and other information of relevance to the images, are offered inTable 3.

Conclusion

Based on the results obtained in Example 2 showing a highsignal-to-noise ratio for miRNA-21 probe variants and no miRNA-210signal, we conclude that 2 M urea in the hybridization buffer enablesspecific analysis of individual miRNA species in routinely-fixed,paraffin-embedded specimen.

Example 3

In situ hybridization of miRNA in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embeddedspecimen by DIG-labeled LNA in response to different urea concentrationsin the hybridization buffer.

Introduction

This Example is designed to evaluate the in situ hybridization signal ofmiRNA in the presence and in the absence of urea in thepre-hybridization and hybridization buffers.

Methods Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination;the in situ hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step;and dehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example1 with the two exceptions. The first exception was that in situhybridization buffers were tested with concentrations of urea of zero or2 M. The second exception was that the hybridization temperature was 55°C. Detection; image analysis; and data presentation were done asdescribed in the General Methods Section.

Specimens.

Serial sections of human colon cancer tissue from the source identifiedin Table 1 were prepared as described in Example 1.

Probes.

A double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probe for miRNA-126 (Seq-IDNo 6 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon, Denmark, were used at aconcentration of 40 nM.

Results

FIG. 3 shows the results of miRNA-126 ISH detection in response to zeroand 2 M concentrations of urea in the pre-hybridization andhybridization buffers. In the presence of 2 M urea, a highsignal-to-noise ratio indicating specific in situ hybridization ofmiRNA-126 was identified in vessels (a few examples of positive signalsare marked by arrows on panel). Non-specific signal was prevalent in theepithelium (marked by stars on the figure). No miRNA-126 in situhybridization was detectable in experiments leaving out urea in thepre-hybridization and hybridization buffers. A dose-response experimentwas designed to establish which urea concentration provided the mostoptimal miRNA in situ hybridization condition. The following ureaconcentrations were tested: 0.5 M; 1.0 M; 2.0 M; 3.0 M; and 4.0 M. Theresults (not shown) showed that a significant reduction of thenon-specific signal was observed at 4 M urea. The best signal-to-noiseratio (i.e., the best performance) for miRNA-126 detection was observedin the presence of 2M urea where virtually no unspecific hybridizationwas observed whereas at the same time, a high specific signal wasobtained. Data on magnification, tissue size and other information ofrelevance to the images, are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

Example 3 shows that the best in situ hybridization signal of themiRNA-126 probe is obtained when prehybridization and hybridization iscarried out in the presence of 2 M urea. No signal was detectable in theabsence of urea. We conclude that urea is a critical component in theprehybridization and hybridization buffers detailed in the Methodssection of Example 1 (Steps 5-6), to obtain a miRNA ISH signal.

Example 4

Efficiency of in situ hybridization of miRNA in routinely-fixed,paraffin-embedded specimen by DIG-labeled LNA probes as a function ofthe hybridization temperature in the presence of 2 M urea.

Introduction

The signal-to-noise ratio of in situ detection of miRNA istemperature-dependent. In Example 4, in situ hybridization of miRNA isexamined at two temperatures to identify which one is most optimal inthe presence of 2 M urea in the in the pre-hybridization andhybridization buffers.

Methods Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination;the in situ hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step;and dehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example1 with the single exception that the hybridization temperature wasadjusted to 48° C. or 55° C. Detection; image analysis; and datapresentation were done as described in the General Methods Section.

Specimens.

Serial sections of human colon cancer tissue from the source identifiedin Table 1 were prepared as described in Example 1.

Probes.

Double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probes for miRNA-21 (Seq-ID No1 in Table 2) and miRNA-126 (Seq-ID No 6 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon,Denmark, were used at a final concentration of 40 nm.

Results

FIG. 4 illustrates miRNA-21 (Panels c-d) and miRNA-126 (Panels a-b) insitu hybridization at 48° C. and 55° C. in the presence of 2 M urea inthe hybridization buffer. Strong in situ hybridization signals formiRNA-21 in tumor stroma (indicated by arrows on the figure) andmiRNA-126 in vessels were observed in sections hybridized at 55° C. Incontrast, a non-specific signal was evident over cancer cell structures(marked by stars on the figure) at 48° C. Of the two hybridizationtemperatures tested in Example 4, the best signal-to-noise ratio for insitu miRNA hybridization was obtained at 55° C. Data on magnification,tissue size and other information of relevance to the images, areoffered in Table 3.

Conclusion

Based on the results of Example 4, we conclude that miRNA detection inroutinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen by in situ hybridization inthe presence of 2 M urea in the hybridization buffer is temperaturedependent and should be optimized for any specific miRNA/probecombination.

Example 5

In situ hybridization of miRNA in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embeddedspecimen by DIG-labeled LNA probes is improved by replacing theconventional, teratogenic compound formamide in the hybridization bufferwith the non-toxic compound urea.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1,with the following exceptions: the hybridization temperature was 55° C.;and in addition to miRNA ISH-detection in the presence of 2 M urea inthe pre-hybridization and hybridization buffers as described in theMethods section of Example 1, miRNA detection was also carried out usingin situ hybridization buffers where urea was replaced by 25% or 50%formamide, as detailed in the Results section. Detection; imageanalysis; and data presentation were done as described in the GeneralMethods Section.

Specimens.

Serial sections of human colon cancer tissue from the source identifiedin Table 1 were prepared as described in Example 1.

Probes.

Double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probes for miRNA-21 (Seq-ID No1 in Table 2) and miRNA-126 (Seq-ID No 6 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon,Denmark, were used at a final concentration of 40 nm.

Results

FIG. 5 shows miRNA-21 (Panels b,d,f) and miRNA-126 (Panels a,c,e) insitu hybridization at 55° C. in the presence of either 25% urea, 25%formamide or 50% formamide in the prehybridization and hybridizationbuffers. The miRNA-21 and miRNA-126 in situ hybridization signals werestrong in the urea-based buffer system, whereas when using formamidebuffers at otherwise identical experimental conditions, low signalintensities were obtained for both miRNA-species. An experiment wasdesigned to evaluate whether lowering of the hybridization temperaturewould improve the miRNA in situ hybridization signals in the presence offormamide. The results showed that decreasing the hybridizationtemperature from 55° C. to 48° C. did not improve the signal-to-noiseratio in the presence of formamide (data not shown). We noted in factthat although a stronger signal for specific miRNA hybridization wasobtained at 48° C. in the presence of 50% formamide, the backgroundsignal (noise) also increased under these experimental conditions,eliminating the advantage of the stronger signal for specific binding(data not shown). Data on magnification, tissue size and otherinformation of relevance to the images, are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

Based on the results of Example 5, we conclude that miRNA detection inroutinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen by in situ hybridization issurprisingly much better in the presence of 2 M urea as compared to whenthe in situ hybridization is carried out in the presence of formamide.

Example 6

Specific in situ hybridization of miRNA in routinely-fixed,paraffin-embedded specimen by DIG-labeled LNA probes is enabled byincreasing the guanidine concentration in the hybridization buffer.

Introduction

This example is designed to illustrate that specific in situhybridization of miRNA in FFPE specimen by DIG-labeled LNA probes isenabled by the chaotroph guanidine. In addition, based on guanidinedose-response miRNA detection, the optimal concentration of guanidine inthe hybridization buffer for in situ hybridization of miRNA species isidentified. For the purpose of comparison, in situ hybridization ofmiRNA in the presence of 2 M urea was also done in this example.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1,with two exceptions. The first exception was that a range of in situpre-hybridization and hybridization buffers were tested withconcentrations of guanidine covering 0.5 M; 1.0 M; 1.5 M and 2.0 M. Thesecond exception was that the hybridization temperature was 55° C. Insitu hybridization of miRNA in the presence of urea was done asdescribed in Example 1 except that the hybridization temperature was 55°C. Detection; image analysis; and data presentation were done asdescribed in the General Methods Section.

Specimens.

Serial sections of human colon cancer tissue from the source identifiedin Table 1 were prepared as described in Example 1.

Probes.

Double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probes for miRNA-126 (Seq-ID No6 in Table 2) and miRNA-210 (Seq-ID No 9 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon,Denmark, were used at a final concentration of 40 nm.

Results

FIG. 6 shows the results of miRNA-126 detection in colon tissue by insitu hybridization at 55° C. in the presence of 2 M urea (Panel a) andvarious concentrations of guanidine in the pre-hybridization andhybridization buffers (Panels c-f). A specific signal for miRNA-126 isidentified in vessels (indicated by arrows on the figure). Non-specificsignals are prevalent in the epithelium (indicated by stars on thefigure). A significant reduction of the non-specific signal was observedat the highest guanidine concentration (Panel c), whereas the intensityof the miRNA-126 specific signal is unaffected by the increasingguanidine concentration. Best performance, however, was obtained whenurea was used in the pre-hybridization and hybridization buffers (Panela), where strong in situ hybridization signals for miRNA-126 wasdetected and non-specific hybridization virtually eliminated. A probetargeting miRNA-210 (which is not expressed in this tissue) was testedas control in the presence of 2 M urea (Panel b). As expected, virtuallyno situ hybridization signal was obtained. Data on magnification, tissuesize and other information of relevance to the images, are offered inTable 3.

Conclusion

We conclude that miRNA detection in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embeddedspecimen by in situ hybridization is enabled by using the chaotropguanidine in the pre-hybridization and hybridization buffers. The bestsignal-to-noise ratio was observed in the presence of 2 M guanidine ascompared to in situ hybridizations carried out at lower guanidineconcentrations. It is also concluded that urea is superior to guanidinefor miRNA detection by in situ hybridization because of its betterperformance and non-toxic nature.

Example 7

Non-toxic, LNA-enabled in situ hybridization allows semi-quantitativeassessment in routinely-fixed FFPE specimen.

Introduction

Illustrated by image analysis of miRNA-21 expression this Exampledemonstrates that a semi-quantitative evaluation of in situhybridization results obtained using urea in the hybridization buffer,is possible.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1.Detection; image analysis; and data presentation were done as describedin the General Methods Section. Semi-quantification of the in situhybridization signal was done using supervised segmentation based onBayesian classification. For miRNA-21 quantification, the miRNA speciesused in this Example, the following histologically stained structureswere differentiated: blue areas (B) corresponded to the hybridizationsignal; red area (R) corresponded to the red nuclear stain (obtainedwith Nuclear Fast Red eg. Sigma-Aldrich cat no N3020 or GeneTex Inc.,cat no GTX73305); purple areas (P) corresponded to the blue in situhybridization signal overlaying nuclear red stain. Mucinous secretionstained with NFR (mostly observed within normal mucosa and onlysporadically appearing in cancer areas) could be discriminated and wasconsidered as background signal. The following parameters were obtainedfor each sample image: B, R, P, total blue (TB=B+P), total red (TR=R+P),as well as TBR=TB/TR.

Specimens.

Serial sections of human colon cancer tissue from the source identifiedin Table 1 were prepared as described in Example 1.

Probe.

A double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probe for miRNA-21 (Seq-ID No1 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon, Denmark, was used at a finalconcentration of 40 nm.

Results

Illustrated by image analysis of miRNA-21 in situ hybridization in coloncancer tissue, FIG. 7. Illustrate the semi-quantitative ISH exemplifiedby the image sampling and image analysis of a miR-21 in situhybridization signal in colon cancer. Panel (a) present a typicalexample of a whole tissue section (panel a) with normal mucosa, tumorarea and submucosa after in situ hybridization for miR-21 andcounterstaining with nuclear red. The tumor area is encircled and randomsystematically placed image positions are indicated by squared frames.Sample images are captured with a 20× objective at the systematicallyplaced image positions. Panel (b) show one such sample image. The sampleimages are subsequently processed with a supervised pixel classifierwhich have been trained to separate the blue in situ hybridizationsignal from the red counter stain and the purple in situ hybridizationsignal overlaying the nuclear red, panel (c). Note false color redcorrelate to nuclear fast red in panel (b) whereas the blue ISH signalin panel (b) is shown as a green false color in panel (c). The areawithin the frames indicated in the lower left corner of panel (b) and(c) are in enlarged and shown in panel (d) and panel (e). Note the bluein situ hybridization signal of panel (d) appear as bright green, thepurple signal of panel (d) is as yellow and the red signal of panel (d)appear as bright red in the classified image, panel (e).

Data on magnification and other information of relevance to the images,are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

We conclude that the chromogenic stain obtained after miRNA in situhybridization in the presence of 2 M urea in the pre-hybridization andhybridization buffers allows subsequent semi-quantitative evaluation.

Example 8

Shelf-life for urea-based hybridization buffer for in situ hybridizationof miRNA in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen exceeds 12months.

Introduction

This Example is designed to evaluate whether the storage time at 4° C.of a hybridization buffer containing 2 M urea has any impact on the insitu hybridization signal of miRNA.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1,with the following exceptions: pre-hybridization and hybridization wascarried out in buffers which were either freshly prepared (as detailedin Example 1); five months old; eight months old or 13 months old. Thepre-hybridization and hybridization buffers which were not freshlyprepared had been stored at 4° C. until the point of use. The miRNA-21probe used in this experiment was diluted to a final concentration of 40nM in the four buffers and incubated on two slides. All slides wereprocessed for image analysis collecting 5-15 images (examples shown inthe Results Section). The TB and TBR values necessary to calculate thebox plots shown in FIG. 8 Panel b) were determined as described in theMethods Section of Example 7. Detection; image analysis; and datapresentation were done as described in the General Methods Section.

Specimens.

Serial sections of three different human colon cancer tissues obtainedfrom the source identified in Table 1, were prepared as described inExample 1.

Probe.

A double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probe for miRNA-21 (Seq-ID No1 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon, Denmark, was used at a finalconcentration of 40 nm.

Results

Illustrated by image analysis of miRNA-21 in situ hybridization in coloncancer tissue, it appears from Example 8 that the urea-based bufferdescribed in the Methods Section of Example 1, Steps 5-6, used forpre-hybridization and in situ hybridization of miRNA, is stable at 4° C.Panel A shows that a strong, highly specific miRNA-21 signal is obtainedin all the buffers tested no matter whether freshly prepared, 5 months,8 months or 13 months old (Panel A). This result is supported by the boxplots of Panel B, which semi-quantitatively documents that there is noloss of miRNA ISH performance by prolonged storage of the urea-basedISH-buffer. Data on magnification, tissue size and other information ofrelevance to the images, are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

We conclude that an in situ hybridization buffer containing the urea isstable at 4° C. for at least 12 months without loss of performance.

Example 9

Non-toxic, LNA-enabled in situ hybridization allows quantitativeassessment of short disease-free survival in stage II colon cancerpatients

Introduction

This Experiment suggests that the level of miR-21 determined by in situhybridization of miR-21 in routinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimenby DIG-labeled LNA in the presence of urea in the hybridization buffercorrelates with survival probabilities for colon cancer patients.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1.Detection; image analysis; and data presentation were done as describedin the General Methods Section. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival arepresented with patients grouped in tertiles based on the miRNA-21values. The assumption of linearity and the proportional hazardsassumption were assessed using Schoenfeld and Martingale residuals.

Specimens.

Serial sections of human colon cancer tissue and sections of humanrectal tissue from the source identified in Table 1 were prepared asdescribed in Example 1.

Probe.

A double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probe for miRNA-21 (Seq-ID No1 in Table 2) designed by Exiqon, Denmark, was used at a finalconcentration of 40 nm.

Results

FIG. 9 shows a tertile plot of Kaplan-Meier estimates of miRNA-21 insitu hybridization signal. Multivariate Cox regression analyses wereperformed to compare the statistical power of the observed miRNA-21expression levels, measured as TBR values (TBR=total blue/total red) inthe colon (A) and rectal (C) cancer patients and TB values (TB=totalblue area) in colon cancer patients. ⅓ of the patient group with highestmiRNA-21 levels (green), ⅓ of patients with intermediate miRNA-21 levels(blue), and ⅓ of the patient group with the lowest miRNA-21 levels(yellow). Data on magnification, tissue size and other information ofrelevance to the images, are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

We conclude the superior performance of an in situ hybridization buffercontaining the chaotropic compound urea enables quantitative assessmentof the in situ hybridization signal that further allows clinical riskassessment.

Example 10

Urea-based hybridization buffer facilitates specific in situhybridization of miRNA-species by DIG-labeled LNA-enhanced probes in anyroutinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens representing a wide rangeof tissue types.

Introduction

Illustrated by in situ hybridization in the presence of 2 M urea ofmiRNA-124, miRNA-126, miRNA-145 and miRNA-205 in tissue sections fromhuman brain, human kidney, human bowel wall and human cervix,respectively, Example 10 demonstrates that urea in the hybridizationbuffer enables specific analysis of individual miRNA species inroutinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens a wide range of tissuetypes.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1.Detection; image analysis; and data presentation were done as describedin the General Methods Section.

Specimens.

Serial tissue sections from routinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimensof human brain, colon, cervix and kidney, obtained from the sourcesidentified in Table 1, were prepared as described in Example 1.

Probes.

Four double digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced oligonucleotides weredesigned by Exiqon, Denmark. The probes included a 20-mer (Seq-ID No 5in Table 2) targeting miRNA-124; a 21-mer (Seq-ID No 6 in Table 2)targeting miRNA-126; a 23-mer (Seq-ID No 7 in Table 2) targetingmiRNA-145; and a 21-mer (Seq-ID No 8 in Table 2) targeting miRNA-205.All probes were tested at a final concentration of 40 nM.

Results

FIG. 10 shows the results of in situ hybridization of four miRNA speciesin different types of human tissue using 2 M urea in the hybridizationbuffer. The four probes targeting miRNA-124 in brain (Panel a),miRNA-126 in kidney (Panel b), miRNA-145 in the bowel wall (Panel c) andmiRNA-205 in cervix (Panel d) all demonstrated an intense signal. Usingdouble digoxigenin-labeled, LNA-enhanced probes, we have also previouslydemonstrated in situ hybridization of miRNA-21 and miRNA-126 in colon(Examples 1 and 3) in the presence of 2 M urea in the hybridizationbuffer. Data on magnification, tissue size and other information ofrelevance to the images are offered in Table 3.

Conclusion

Based on the results obtained in Examples 2, 3 and 10, we conclude thaturea in the hybridization buffer enables a non-toxic, specific in situhybridization of individual miRNA species in a wide range of human,routinely-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens.

Example 11 Detection of β-Actin mRNA Introduction

To illustrate that the method of the invention is applicable for mosttypes of RNA including mRNA β-actin mRNA was detected. β-actin is anon-muscle actin that takes part in the formation of filamentscomprising a major component of the cytoskeleton. Due to its general andwidespread expression, β-actin expression is often used fornormalization in Northern Blotting. The number of specific binding sitesto β-actin mRNA be far below that of the U6 snRNA probes. Accordinglythe use of β-actin as ISH normalization require a more sensitive ISHmethod.

Methods

Mounting of tissue sections on solid support; deparaffination; the insitu hybridization procedure including the prehybridization step; anddehydration were done as described in the Methods Section of Example 1using 2M urea in the hybridization buffer.

Specimens

A standard FFPE specimen of human esophagus cancer The FFPE samplespurchased from Proteogenex (Culver City, Calif.).

Probe

A double DIG-labelled 20 base long LNA™ probe specific to β-actin mRNA(acgaaggctcatcattcaaa (Seq ID NO 13)) LNA content 40%.

Results

This experiment show a highly specific in situ hybridization signal forhuman β-actin mRNA in the human esophagus cancer using an LNA probe. Thesignal was seen both in cancer and stroma cells. As expected the signalwas cytoplasmatic localized and varied considerable between differentcell typen (FIG. 11)

Conclusion

This example showed that the method of the invention provide sensitiveand specific detection of β-actin mRNA in routinely formalin fixedparaffin embedded specimens.

1. A formamide-free, detergent-free hybridization buffer for detectingsmall non-coding RNAs in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE)tissue sections with LNA-probes by in situ hybridization, the buffercomprising: a hybrid stabilizing agent comprising salts of mono-valentcations, salts of di-valent cations, or salts of mono-valent cations anddi-valent cations; 0.5 to 5 M of a chaotropic component of urea, saltsof guanidinium, salts of guanidine, or a mixture of two or more selectedfrom the group consisting of urea, salts of guanidinium, and salts ofguanidine; Denhardt's Solution; and a carrier RNA.
 2. The hybridizationbuffer according to claim 1, wherein the chaotropic component is urea,guanidine hydrochloride, or a mixture of urea and guanidinehydrochloride.
 3. The hybridization buffer according to claim 1, whereinthe chaotropic component is urea.
 4. The hybridization buffer accordingto claim 3, wherein the buffer further comprises: SSC; 2M urea;Denhardt's Solution; and 0.25 mg/mL yeast t-RNA.
 5. A kit for detectionof at least one small non-coding RNAs in formalin-fixed andparaffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue by in situ hybridization, said kitcomprising the formamide-free, hybridization buffer of claim 13 andleast one LNA-probe optimized for the specific detection of said onesmall non-coding RNA.
 6. The kit according to claim 5 wherein the smallnon-coding RNA is a microRNA.
 7. The kit according to claim 5 whereinthe LNA-probe is labeled at both the 3′ end and the 5′-end withdigoxigenin.
 8. The kit according to claim 6, wherein the LNA-probe islabeled at both the 3′ end and the 5′-end with digoxigenin.
 9. Thehybridization buffer according to claim 2, wherein the chaotropiccomponent is urea.
 10. The hybridization buffer according to claim 9,wherein the buffer further comprises: a hybrid stabilizing agentcomprising salts of mono-valent cations, salts of di-valent cations, orsalts of mono-valent cations and di-valent cations; urea; Denhardt'sSolution; and a carrier RNA.
 11. A kit for detection of at least onesmall non-coding RNAs in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE)tissue by in situ hybridization, said kit comprise the formamide-free,hybridization buffer of claim 10 and least one LNA-probe optimized forthe specific detection of said one small non-coding RNA.
 12. The kitaccording to claim 11, wherein the small non-coding RNA is a microRNA.13. The kit according to claim 11, wherein the LNA-probe is labeled atboth the 3′ end and the 5′-end with digoxigenin.
 14. The kit accordingto claim 12, wherein the LNA-probe is labeled at both the 3′ end and the5′-end with digoxigenin.